Mukesh Kumar v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
Criminal revision by Mukesh Kumar against State of U.P. dismissed as barred by limitation since the application for condonation of delay was dismissed as not pressed.
What did the court decide?
None. Criminal revision stands dismissed being barred by limitation.
What the court decided
Court No. - 23
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION DEFECTIVE No. - 36 of 2002
Revisionist :- Mukesh Kumar Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Revisionist :- A.N. Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate,Govind Saran Hajela
Hon'ble Rajendra Kumar-IV,J.
Order on Delay Condonation Application No.16549 of 2002
This is an application filed under Section 5 of Limitation Act, 1963 seeking condonation of delay in filing criminal revision, which is reported to be barred by limitation.
Heard Sri Satendra Kumar Mishra, Advocate holding brief of Sri A.N. Mishra, learned counsel for the revisionist and learned A.G.A. for the State.
After some arguments, Sri Satendra Kumar Mishra, Advocate holding brief of Sri A.N. Mishra, learned counsel for the revisionist submits that he does not want to press the application and the same may be dismissed as not pressed.
Accordingly, the delay condonation application is dismissed as not pressed.
Order Date :- 3.4.2019 Vivek Kr.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the criminal revision should be dismissed as it was filed beyond limitation and the condonation application was dismissed as not pressed.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Mukesh Kumar
- respondent
State Of U.P.
Coram
Rajendra Kumar-IV,J.
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · April
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLRD/36/2002
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court