The High Court dismissed a criminal revision petition as time-barred. The delay condonation application was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the revisionist's absence. The court held the revision barred by limitation.
Dismissal of delay condonation application no.112431 of 2002; dismissal of criminal revision being barred by limitation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 23
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION DEFECTIVE No. - 155 of 2002
Revisionist :- Smt. Shama Parveen Opposite Party :- Aaquil Hussain Counsel for Revisionist :- Tej Pal
Hon'ble Rajendra Kumar-IV,J.
Order on Delay Condonation Application No.112431 of 2002.
Called out in the revise list. No one is present on behalf of the revisionist to press this application.
Learned A.G.A. is present on behalf of State.
This criminal revision is time barred and delay condonation application no.112431 of 2002 has been moved by the revisionist to condone the delay in filing the revision, but none is present to press the said application.
Accordingly, the delay condonation application no.112431 of 2002 is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Order Date :- 3.4.2019 Vivek Kr.
Court No. - 23
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION DEFECTIVE No. - 155 of 2002
Revisionist :- Smt. Shama Parveen Opposite Party :- Aaquil Hussain Counsel for Revisionist :- Tej Pal
Hon'ble Rajendra Kumar-IV,J.
Since this criminal revision has been filed beyond time and application seeking condonation of delay has been dismissed for want of prosecution, hence, this criminal revision stands dismissed being barred by limitation.
Order Date :- 3.4.2019 Vivek Kr.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a criminal revision barred by limitation can be entertained after the delay condonation application fails due to want of prosecution.
Smt. Shama Parveen
Aaquil Hussain
Rajendra Kumar-IV
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
