The court allowed a bail application filed by Rinku in a case under the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. The applicant was released on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties subject to standard conditions.
Released on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two reliable sureties subject to conditions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 23
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 12677 of 2019
Applicant :- Rinku Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Rajendra Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Rajendra Kumar-IV,J.
Heard Shri Rajendra Singh, learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for State and perused the material available on record.
This bail application has been filed by the accused-applicant Rinku, who is involved in Case Crime No. 289 of 2018, under Section 3(1) Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, Police Station Rajepur, District Farrukhabad.
Learned counsel for the applicant submits that applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case for the purpose of harassment, therefore, false and fabricated prosecution story has been concocted by the police. He further submitted that in the gang chart only one is shown against the accused-applicant, in all the cases he has been released on bail. Applicant is in jail since 06.09.2018. It is further submitted that there is no possibility of the applicant fleeing away from the judicial process or tampering with the witnesses. In case the applicant is enlarged on bail, he shall not misuse the liberty of bail.
Learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail but did not dispute the factual submissions made by the learned counsel for the applicant.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and rival contention of learned counsel, without commenting upon the merit of the case, I am of the opinion that the applicant is entitled to be released on bail.
Accordingly, bail application is allowed.
Let applicant Rinku be released on bail in the aforesaid case crime on his furnishing a personal bond and two reliable sureties to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to the following conditions:-
In breach of any condition enumerated above, Trial Court shall be at liberty to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law.
Order Date :- 2.4.2019 I.A.Siddiqui
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the accused-applicant is entitled to release on bail in a case under the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Rinku
Rajendra Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
