Revision dismissed as connected delay condonation application was dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 23
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION DEFECTIVE No. - 342 of 2001
Revisionist :- Smt. Sheela Devi Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Others Counsel for Revisionist :- B. Ram Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Rajendra Kumar-IV,J.
In Ref: Civil Misc. Delay Condonation Application No.103831 of 2001
Order Date :- 1.5.2019 Akram
Court No. - 23
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION DEFECTIVE No. - 342 of 2001
Revisionist :- Smt. Sheela Devi Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Others Counsel for Revisionist :- B. Ram Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Rajendra Kumar-IV,J.
Since delay condonation application has been dismissed for want of prosecution, therefore, this criminal revision also stands dismissed
Order Date :- 1.5.2019 Akram
Smt. Sheela Devi
State Of U.P.
Rajendra Kumar-IV
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
