Criminal revision barred by limitation; condonation application dismissed in absence of applicant. Revision dismissed as time-barred.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 23
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION DEFECTIVE No. - 191 of 2002
Revisionist :- Shashi Kant Sharma Opposite Party :- Hari Shanker And Others Counsel for Revisionist :- B.K. Solanki Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Rajendra Kumar-IV,J.
(C.M. Delay Condonation Application No.140610 of 2002)
No one is present on behalf of revisionist to press the application seeking condonation of delay in filing criminal revision.
Accordingly, the delay condonation application is hereby dismissed for want of prosecution.
Order Date :- 29.4.2019 I.A.Siddiqui
. . .
Court No. - 23
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION DEFECTIVE No. - 191 of 2002
Revisionist :- Shashi Kant Sharma Opposite Party :- Hari Shanker And Others Counsel for Revisionist :- B.K. Solanki Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Rajendra Kumar-IV,J.
Since this criminal revision has been filed beyond time and application seeking condonation of delay has been dismissed. This criminal revision stands dismissed being barred by limitation.
Order Date :- 29.4.2019 I.A.Siddiqui
Shashi Kant Sharma
Hari Shanker
Rajendra Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
