Single judge dismissed criminal revision No. 296 of 2001 as being consequentially dismissed following dismissal of delay condonation application for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 23
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION DEFECTIVE No. - 296 of 2001
Revisionist :- Bhim Singh Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Another Counsel for Revisionist :- A.K. Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate,Pankaj Rai
Hon'ble Rajendra Kumar-IV,J.
In Ref: Civil Misc. Delay Condonation Application of 2001.
Order Date :- 1.5.2019 Akram
Court No. - 23
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION DEFECTIVE No. - 296 of 2001
Revisionist :- Bhim Singh Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Another Counsel for Revisionist :- A.K. Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate,Pankaj Rai
Hon'ble Rajendra Kumar-IV,J.
Since delay condonation application has been dismissed for want of prosecution, therefore, this criminal revision also stands dismissed.
Order Date :- 1.5.2019 Akram
Rajendra Kumar-IV
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
