The Court dismissed a criminal revision application as the related condonation of delay application was dismissed for want of prosecution, rendering the revision without merit.
Criminal revision and associated condonation application dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 23
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION DEFECTIVE No. - 92 of 2001
Revisionist :- Nareshpal Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Another Counsel for Revisionist :- Shiam Lal Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Rajendra Kumar-IV,J.
In Ref: Civil Misc. Delay Condonation Application of 2001.
Court No. - 23
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION DEFECTIVE No. - 92 of 2001
Revisionist :- Nareshpal Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Another Counsel for Revisionist :- Shiam Lal Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Rajendra Kumar-IV,J.
Since delay condonation application has been dismissed for want of prosecution, therefore, this criminal revision also stands dismissed.
Order Date :- 1.5.2019
Nareshpal
State Of U.P.
Rajendra Kumar-IV
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
