Revision dismissed by the court on 17.7.2019 for want of prosecution as the revisionist did not appear to present arguments.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 28
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION DEFECTIVE No. - 210 of 2002
Revisionist :- Brahmanand Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Others Counsel for Revisionist :- Shamsher Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Rajeev Misra,J.
Case called out in the revised list.
No one appears on behalf of the revisionist to press the revision. Learned A.G.A. representing the opposite party no.1 is present.
The revision is, accordingly, dismissed for want of prosecution.
Order Date :- 17.7.2019 Vivek Kr.
Brahmanand
State Of U.P.
Rajeev Misra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
