Criminal revision dismissed for want of prosecution after no appearance by the revisionists despite the opposite party being present.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 28
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 4002 of 2005
Revisionist :- Shiv Kumar And Others Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Another Counsel for Revisionist :- D.K. Tiwari,A. Prasad,Ramesh Chandra Gupta,S.K. Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate,Sarvesh
Hon'ble Rajeev Misra,J.
Case called out in the revised list.
No one appears on behalf of the revisionists to press the revision. Learned A.G.A. representing the opposite party no.1 is present.
The revision is, accordingly, dismissed for want of prosecution.
Order Date :- 17.7.2019 Vivek Kr.
Shiv Kumar And Others
State Of U.P. And Another
Rajeev Misra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
