A criminal revision was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the non-appearance of the revisionist's counsel. No substantive order on merits was passed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 28
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 469 of 2004
Revisionist :- Ram Dass And Others Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Another Counsel for Revisionist :- A.K. Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate,Onkar Nath
Hon'ble Rajeev Misra,J.
Case called out in the revised list.
Learned counsel for the revisionists is not present.
The revision is, accordingly, dismissed for want of prosecution. Order Date :- 4.7.2019 HSM
Ram Dass And Others
State Of U.P. And Another
Rajeev Misra
J.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
