This order dismisses a criminal revision for want of prosecution due to the absence of the revisionist's counsel.
Revision dismissed due to absence of the revisionist's counsel.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 28
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 463 of 2004
Revisionist :- Subedar Singh Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Others Counsel for Revisionist :- R.K. Rathore Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate,S.K. Srivatava
Hon'ble Rajeev Misra,J.
Case called out in the revised list.
Learned counsel for the revisionist is not present.
The revision is, accordingly, dismissed for want of prosecution. Order Date :- 4.7.2019 HSM
Subedar Singh
State Of U.P.
Rajeev Misra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
