A criminal revision petition filed by the revisionist Ravish against the State of U.P. was called out in the list, but the revisionist's counsel was absent. The court dismissed the revision due to want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 28
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 2096 of 2005
Revisionist :- Ravish Opposite Party :- State Of U.P And Another Counsel for Revisionist :- Atul Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Rajeev Misra,J.
Case called out in the revised list.
Learned counsel for the revisionist is not present.
The revision is, accordingly, dismissed for want of prosecution. Order Date :- 4.7.2019 HSM
Rajeev Misra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
