The criminal revision was dismissed for want of prosecution as counsel for the revisionist was absent. No substantive legal issue was decided.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 28
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 3559 of 2003
Revisionist :- Hari Shankar Opposite Party :- Mangalchand Nagaliya And Others Counsel for Revisionist :- P.K. Mishra
Hon'ble Rajeev Misra,J.
Case called out in the revised list.
Learned counsel for the revisionist is not present.
The revision is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Order Date :- 3.7.2019 HSM
Hari Shankar
Mangalchand Nagaliya
Rajeev Misra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
