Criminal Revision filed by Jagdanba Prasad and Another against the conviction and sentence under Section 323 IPC. The Hon'ble Court perused the record as no one appeared to press the revision. Finding no manifest error or illegality, the court dismissed the revision.
The criminal revision is dismissed. Any interim order, if any, stands vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 2033 of 1998
Revisionist :- Jagdanba Prasad And Another Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Revisionist :- D.S.M.Tripathi,Ram Lalit Chaudhary
Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt.Advocate
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
Order Date :- 19.10.2019 AK
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to allow the criminal revision filed against the conviction and sentence under Section 323 IPC.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Jagdanba Prasad
Another
State Of U.P.
Sudhir Agarwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
