Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal, J. heard a criminal revision under Section 397/401 Cr.P.C. He perused the record as no one appeared. Finding no manifest error or illegality, he dismissed the revision and vacated any interim order.
Revision dismissed. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 1546 of 1997
Revisionist :- Mewa Ram Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Revisionist :- Ravindra Sharma Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
Order Date :- 19.10.2019 Siddhant Sahu
1 issue framed by the court
Whether there is manifest illegality or procedural error in the judgment dismissing the criminal appeal under the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act to warrant interference in criminal revision.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Sudhir Agarwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
