This order rejects an application for anticipatory bail, dismissing it as the investigation establishes prima facie that the applicant collected money from candidates on a promise of government jobs.
Prayer for anticipatory bail is dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 69
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 54087 of 2019
Applicant :- Sanju Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Rajesh Kumar Srivastava,Virendra Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Yashwant Varma,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant and Sri I.P. Srivastava, learned AGA.
The Court finds itself unable to countenance the prayer for anticipatory bail bearing in mind the material which has been gathered during the course of investigation which establishes prima facie that the applicant has collected moneys to the extent of Rs. 33,00,000/- from different candidates on promise of the Government jobs being arranged.
Consequently the application is dismissed.
Order Date :- 18.12.2019 LA/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the application for anticipatory bail is maintainable given prima facie evidence of fraud.
Sanju
State Of U.P
Yashwant Varma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
