The criminal miscellaneous bail application seeking anticipatory bail was dismissed. The court held that the gravity of allegations regarding misappropriation, cheating, and forgery prevented granting relief.
Anticipatory bail application dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 69
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 50341 of 2019
Applicant :- Poonam Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Shivam Yadav,Akhilesh Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Rakesh Pande (Senior Adv.),Sujeet Kumar
Hon'ble Yashwant Varma,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Rakesh Pande, learned Senior counsel appearing for the informant and Sri Om Prakash, learned AGA.
Learned counsel for the applicant contends that a private agreement which has been relied upon cannot possibly form the basis for invocation of the provisions of the IPC. where allegations of misappropriation, cheating and forgery are alleged.
The Court finds itself unable to countenance the prayer of the applicant for anticipatory bail bearing in mind the seriousness of the allegations made in the FIR.
The application is dismissed.
Order Date :- 18.12.2019 LA/-
2 issues framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail can be granted given allegations of misappropriation, cheating, and forgery based on a private agreement.
Whether the seriousness of allegations in the FIR precludes relief under the bail application.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Poonam
State of U.P.
Yashwant Varma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
