Rahul Alias Bharat v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No.…
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No.…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 69
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 52446 of 2019
Applicant :- Rahul Alias Bharat Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Bipin Kumar Tripathi,Ashok Kumar Yadav
Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Yashwant Varma,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Vikas Sahai, the learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.
The instant application has been moved seeking anticipatory bail in light of the apprehension of the arrest of the applicant in Case Crime No. 401 of 2019, under Sections 363, 376 IPC and Section 3/4 Protection of Children From Sexual Offences Act 2012, police station Rampur Karkhana, District Deoria.
Bearing in mind the seriousness of the allegations which stand levelled and have been duly corroborated by the victim in her statement under Section 164 Cr.P.C., the Court finds no ground for according the facility of anticipatory bail to the applicant. The prayer so made is refused.
The application consequently stands rejected .
Order Date :- 11.12.2019 faraz
Rahul Alias Bharat
Yashwant Varma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court