It is argued by the learned counsel for the applicant that for the alleged incident dated 3rd January, 2019, the present first information report has been lodged by Vishnu Dat Sharma on 6th January, 2019 against as many as seven named accused persons and one unknown person i.e. after three days from the date of incident for which no plausible explanation has been given which makes the prosecution case doubtful. In the first information report it has been alleged that the son of the informant, namely, Mohit had a general merchant shop and earlier the co-accused Rahul, who was a seller of lemon, had purchased some items from the shop of the son of the informant without paying any money on the assurance that he would pay later on. On 2nd January, 2019, when son of the informant insisted the co-accused to pay the money of the goods which had been taken by him from his shop, he refused to pay the same and a hot talk took place between them. On 3rd January, 2019 at 06:00 o'clock, when the son of the informant was going to the place of his friend from his shop, then on the way, all the accused persons having illegal weapons, abusing the son of the informant, assaulted him due to which he sustained injuries. It has further been argued by the learned counsel for the applicant that in the statement recorded under Section 161 Cr.P.C., the injured has reiterated the same version as unfolded in the first information report. As per the version of the first information report and the statement of the injured, general role of causing injuries to the injured has been assigned to all the accused person. No specific as to who is the author of the injuries caused to the injured has been assigned to any of the accused persons. As per the medical examination report, the injuries sustained by the injured are simple in nature and not dangerous to his life. It has further been argued by the learned counsel for the applicant that the co-accused, namely, Rahul Lemon Wale and Ankit @ Bhaynkar Sanni and have already been enlarged on bail by this Court, their bail orders have been enclosed as Annexure-5 to the affidavit accompanying the present bail application. The case of the present applicant is also similar and identical to that of the aforesaid co-accused. As such the present applicant is also liable to be enlarged on bail. The
