Learned counsel for applicant contends that applicant has been falsely implicated for causing death of his wife Smt. Rashmi Mishra; that in FIR, date of marriage of applicant with Rashmi has been wrongly mentioned as 27.02.2009 just to bring the case within the purview of Section 304-B IPC; that real fact is that marriage between applicant and deceased did take place on 02.02.2008, and out of wedlock twins were born to applicant and deceased on 10.04.2009; that school certificates of master Anshraj Misra and Ms. Vansika Mishra, twins brother and sister show that their date of birth mentioned in school register is 10.04.2009 which belies the contention of marriage on 27.02.2009; that applicant neither made any demand of dowry from deceased nor treated her with cruelty for non fulfilment of demand of dowry; that death of Smt. Rashmi has taken place on 11.11.2015 after a period of more than 7½ years of marriage and provisions of Section 304-B IPC and 113-B of Indian Evidence Act, which are applicable in cases of dowry death are not applicable in this case; that real fact is that deceased was working as a nurse in Jeevan Jyoti Hospital and due to young age of 6 year old twin children she was mentally disturbed, and upon being asked by applicant to leave service, she was living under depression and appears to have consumed poisonous substance to commit suicide; that it is absolutely wrong to say that applicant administered poisonous substance to deceased; that copy of the order sheet of S.T. No. 173 of 2016 filed as R.A.-1 and R.A.-2 shows that till today not even a single prosecution witness has been produced and on each and every date, prosecution seeks adjournment on the ground that witnesses are not produced; that applicant has no criminal history; that
