Dismissed
Harish Chandra v. State of U.P. and Others
Allahabad HCA482/16161/2005
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
In a composite order revising an impugned order, the Division Bench dismissed an old Section 482 Cr.P.C. application filed in 2005 vide a one-line order holding that by efflux of time, either the cause of action no longer survived or the matter had become infructuous since no party appeared to press it. No substantive reasoning was provided.
What did the court decide?
The application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. was dismissed due to efflux of time and non-appearance of parties.