This court dismissed an application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. as infructuous because no one appeared to press it, noting that the efflux of time may have rendered the cause of action non-surviving.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 15862 of 2005
Applicant :- Rajendra Singh Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- D.K. Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
Order Date :- 28.11.2019 AK
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Rajendra Singh
State of U.P.
Sudhir Agarwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
