Bhuar Alias Nizamuddin and Others v. State of U.P. and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
In this application under Section 482 Cr.P.C., filed in 2005 and pending since, the applicant did not appear to press the matter. The court held that the efflux of time rendered the application infructuous and dismissed it. The application was called in revise but heard in absence.
What did the court decide?
Application dismissed on account of efflux of time rendering the matter infructuous.