Petitioners filed an application seeking withdrawal of a petition under Article 227 as the dispute between them was settled. The Court allowed the application and dismissed the petition as not pressed while vacating any interim order.
Application for withdrawal allowed; petition dismissed as not pressed; interim order vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 40
Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 3370 of 2019
Petitioner :- Govind Singh And Another Respondent :- District Judge And 7 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rakesh Pande,Neeraj Rai Counsel for Respondent :- Shashi Nandan,Ambrish Chandra Pandey,Shashi Nandan
Hon'ble Manoj Kumar Gupta,J.
Heard counsel for the parties.
The petitioners have filed an application seeking withdrawal of the petition. In support of the application, affidavit of petitioner no.1 has been filed and wherein it is stated that after passing of interim order by this Court, the parties have settled the dispute and therefore, the petitioners do not wish to press the petition.
The application is allowed. The petition is dismissed as not pressed.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
(Manoj Kumar Gupta, J.)
Order Date :- 9.7.2019 Shashank
Govind Singh And Another
District Judge And 7 Others
Manoj Kumar Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
