Dilip Dubey v. State of U.P. Thru Revenue Secy. and 2 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
No substantive proposition as the writ petition was dismissed solely for want of prosecution in this no-case-stage hearing.
No substantive proposition as the writ petition was dismissed solely for want of prosecution in this no-case-stage hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 32
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 9236 of 2014
Petitioner :- Dilip Dubey Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru Revenue Secy. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Omkar Nath Rai Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Sriprakash Srivastava
Hon'ble Shashi Kant Gupta,J. Hon'ble Mrs. Manju Rani Chauhan,J.
List is being revised. None appeared on behalf of the petitioner to press this petition.
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands discharged.
Order Date :- 12.12.2018 JK Yadav
Dilip Dubey
State Of U.P. Thru Revenue Secy.
Shashi Kant Gupta
Manju Rani Chauhan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court