Raj Kumar and 3 Others v. State of U.P. and 4 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court held that the petitioner's grievance regarding the erection of electric poles and lines falls within the domain of the Collector and District Magistrate. The petitioners were permitted to approach the local authorities, directing a final decision within three months. The writ petition was disposed of accordingly.
What did the court decide?
The petitioners were permitted to move the Collector and District Magistrate for a final decision on their claim within three months.
What the court decided
Court No. - 32
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 12692 of 2018
Petitioner :- Raj Kumar And 3 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Kalp Nath Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Pankaj Kumar Shukla
Hon'ble Shashi Kant Gupta,J. Hon'ble Mrs. Manju Rani Chauhan,J.
Heard Sri Kalp Nath, learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Standing Counsel for the respondent nos.1 and 3 and Sri Pankaj Kumar Shukla, learned counsel for respondent nos. 2, 4 and 5
The relief which the petitioners seek, is in the following terms:
"(i) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the Respondents not to fix the poles and not to lay over head High Power Electric Lines from the residential plot of the petitioner."
The grievance of the petitioners would fall within the jurisdiction of the Collector and District Magistrate, having regard to the provisions of Rule 3 of the Works of Licensees Rules, 2006 which have been framed under the Electricity Act, 2003.
Consequently, we permit the petitioners to move the Collector and District Magistrate, Mirzapur with a copy of their claim together with a certified copy of this order and placing reliance upon such other material as the petitioners may seek to rely upon. The Collector and District Magistrate shall take a final decision on the application preferably within a period of three months of the receipt of a copy of the application.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Court should exercise jurisdiction to prevent the laying of High Power Electric Lines on the petitioner's residential plot.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Raj Kumar And 3 Others
- respondent
State Of U.P. And 4 Others
Coram
Shashi Kant Gupta
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · December
- Registered
- Case no.
- WRIC/12692/2018
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court