Suresh Chandra Sharma v. State of U.P. and 4 Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
None appeared for the petitioner. The writ petition was dismissed for want of prosecution, and any interim order was vacated.
None appeared for the petitioner. The writ petition was dismissed for want of prosecution, and any interim order was vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 32
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 23667 of 2016
Petitioner :- Suresh Chandra Sharma Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Ors. Counsel for Petitioner :- Vijay Kumar Rathi Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C., Ishwar Chandra Tyagi, Tarun Agrawal
Hon'ble Shashi Kant Gupta,J. Hon'ble Mrs. Manju Rani Chauhan,J.
List has been revised. None appears on behalf of the petitioner.
The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 12.12.2018 Arun
Suresh Chandra Sharma
State Of U.P.
Shashi Kant Gupta
Manju Rani Chauhan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court