High Court dismissed a writ petition filed by a company challenging an order issued by respondent no. 5, citing an incomplete set of facts and granting liberty to file a fresh petition.
Liberty to file a fresh writ petition upon filing complete facts.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 32
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 23853 of 2018
Petitioner :- M/S Maheshwari Bulk Carrir Through Its Partner Rajesh Maheshwari Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 7 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Phool Singh Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Tarun Varma
Hon'ble Shashi Kant Gupta,J. Hon'ble Rajiv Gupta,J.
This writ petition has been filed, inter alia , for the following relief:
"A. A writ, order of direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the order dated 24.4.2018 issued by the respondent no. 5(Annexure no. 5)."
From perusal of the writ petition, it transpires that this writ petition has been filed on incomplete set of facts, as such this court has no option but to dismiss this writ petition with liberty to the petitioner to file fresh writ petition.
In view of the above, the writ petition stands dismissed.
Order Date :- 20.7.2018 MLK
M/S Maheshwari Bulk Carrir Through Its Partner Rajesh Maheshwari
State Of U.P.
Shashi Kant Gupta
Rajiv Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
