Israr Ahmad v. State of U.P. and 2 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 23363 of 2018…
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 23363 of 2018…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 36
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 23363 of 2018
Petitioner :- Israr Ahmad Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Mohd. Yusuf Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Yashwant Varma,J.
Heard Mr. Mohd. Yusuf, the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel.
Undisputedly the recovery citation has been issued pursuant to an order passed by the Labour Court against the Nyay Panchayat. Even the citation appended along with this petition is in the name of the local body. Learned counsel for the petitioner has been unable to draw the attention of the Court to any evidence to establish that the coercive action is being taken against him personally.
In view thereof, the writ petition lacks merit and is consequently dismissed .
Order Date :- 19.7.2018 Arun K. Singh
Israr Ahmad
State Of U.P.
Yashwant Varma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court