This order disposed of a substitution application and the underlying writ petition. It rejected the substitution for want of prosecution after the sole petitioner died without heirs substituting, and consequently dismissed the writ petition.
Rejection of substitution application; Dismissal of writ petition; Discharge of interim orders.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 62
Case :- WRIT - B No. - 235 of 1981 Petitioner :- Kalu Respondent :- The D.D.C. & Ohters Counsel for Petitioner :- M.C. Dwivedi Counsel for Respondent :- S.C.,R.K. Mishra
Hon'ble Ajit Kumar,J.
Order on Substitution Application
List is being revised. Nobody is present on behalf of applicant/petitioner to press this substitution application to substitution the heirs of sole petitioner.
It appears that nobody is interested in pursuing the substitution application.
Accordingly the substitution application is rejected for want of prosecution.
Order Date :- 10.8.2018 sailesh
Court No. - 62
Case :- WRIT - B No. - 235 of 1981 Petitioner :- Kalu Respondent :- The D.D.C. & Ohters Counsel for Petitioner :- M.C. Dwivedi Counsel for Respondent :- S.C.,R.K. Mishra
Hon'ble Ajit Kumar,J.
As the sole petitioner has died and nobody is substituted, consequently, the writ petition is also dismissed.
Interim order, if any, stands discharged.
Order Date :- 10.8.2018 sailesh
Kalu
The D.D.C. & Others
Ajit Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
