The court disposed of the writ petition relying on the judgment rendered on the same day in Writ-A No.2868 of 2018. No further details of the matter were provided in this terse order.
Disposed of in terms of the judgment in Writ-A No.2868 of 2018.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 18
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 5047 of 2018
Petitioner :- Suchita Devi Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Ors. Counsel for Petitioner :- Amaresh Yadava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J.
Learned counsel for the parties submit that the controversy involved in the present writ petition is squarely covered by the judgement and order rendered today 06.02.2018 in Writ-A No.2868 of 2018 (Bibha Singh Kushwaha and 21 others vs. State of UP and 2 ors).
The writ petition, is accordingly, disposed of in terms of the judgement rendered in Writ-A No.2868 of 2018 (Bibha Singh Kushwaha and 21 others vs. State of UP and 2 ors).
Order Date :- 6.2.2018 Ravi Prakash
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Bibha Singh Kushwaha and 21 others vs. State of UP and 2 orsRelied on¶5
Writ-A No.2868 of 2018 (Bibha Singh Kushwaha and 21 others vs. State of UP and 2 ors)
Suchita Devi
State Of U.P.
1st Ors.
2nd Ors.
3rd Ors.
Mahesh Chandra Tripathi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
