Seema Pandey v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petitioner relied on a contemporaneous judgment (Writ-A No. 2868 of 2018) covering the identical controversy, requesting disposition on the same terms.
What the court decided
Court No. - 18
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 3645 of 2018
Petitioner :- Seema Pandey Respondent :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Petitioner :- Navin Kumar Sharma Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Ashok Kumar Yadav
Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J.
Learned counsel for the parties submit that the controversy involved in the present writ petition is squarely covered by the judgment and order rendered today in Writ-A No. 2868 of 2018 (Bibha Singh Kushwaha and 21 others vs. State of U.P. and 2 others).
The writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of in terms of the judgment rendered in Writ-A No. 2868 of 2018 (Bibha Singh Kushwaha and 21 others vs. State of U.P. and 2 others).
Order Date :- 6.2.2018 VR
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Seema Pandey
- respondent
State Of U.P.
Coram
Mahesh Chandra Tripathi
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · February
- Registered
- Case no.
- WRIA/3645/2018
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court