Sangeeta v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 4704 of 2018…
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 4704 of 2018…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 18
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 4704 of 2018
Petitioner :- Sangeeta Respondent :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Petitioner :- Navin Kumar Sharma Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Ashok Kumar Yadav
Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J.
Learned counsel for the parties submits that the controversy involved in the present writ petition is squarely covered by the judgment and order rendered today in Writ A No.2868 of 2018 (Bibha Singh Kushwaha and 21 others Vs. State of U. P. and 2 others) .
The writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of in terms of the judgment rendered in Writ A No.2868 of 2018 (Bibha Singh Kushwaha and 21 others Vs State of U. P. and 2 others).
Order Date :- 6.2.2018 Manish Himwan
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Bibha Singh Kushwaha and 21 others Vs. State of U. P. and 2 othersRelied on¶5
Writ A No.2868 of 2018 (Bibha Singh Kushwaha and 21 others Vs. State of U. P. and 2 others)
Sangeeta
State Of U.P.
Mahesh Chandra Tripathi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court