The Supreme Court, in a listed case, dismissed Writ Petition No. 37059 of 2001 on the non-appearance of the petitioner, noting the probable inaction of the petitioner as a result of which no merit was found. The stay order was vacated.
Writ petition dismissed; stay order vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 7
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 37059 of 2001
Petitioner :- Jata Shankar Pandey Respondent :- Commissioner Basti Division Basti & Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Swarn Kumar Srivastava,Anil Kumar Srivastava
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Surya Prakash Kesarwani,J.
List revised. Case called out. No one appears on behalf of the petitioner to press this writ petition.
Learned standing counsel is present.
It appears that either cause of action does not survive or the petitioner has lost interest in pursuing the writ petition or there is no merit. Therefore, the writ petition is dismissed. Stay order, if any, is vacated.
Liberty is granted to the petitioner to move a recall application within 30 days, if he feels that the writ petition still survives.
With the aforesaid observations, the Writ Petition is dismissed .
Order Date :- 30.5.2018 NLY
Jata Shankar Pandey
Commissioner Basti Division Basti
Others
Surya Prakash Kesarwani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
