In the absence of petitioner appearing to press the writ petition, the court ordered dismissal citing non-survival of cause of action or lack of interest, while vacating any stay order and granting liberty to seek recall.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 7
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 35891 of 2001
Petitioner :- Ram Pyare Chauhan Respondent :- State Of U.P. & Others Counsel for Petitioner :- R.C. Dwivedi,Sanjay Kumar Rai Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,S.P. Singh
Hon'ble Surya Prakash Kesarwani,J.
List revised. Case called out. No one appears on behalf of the petitioner to press this writ petition.
Learned standing counsel is present.
It appears that either cause of action does not survive or the petitioner has lost interest in pursuing the writ petition or there is no merit. Therefore, the writ petition is dismissed. Stay order, if any, is vacated.
Liberty is granted to the petitioner to move a recall application within 30 days, if he feels that the writ petition still survives.
With the aforesaid observations, the Writ Petition is dismissed .
Order Date :- 29.5.2018 vkg
Ram Pyare Chauhan
State Of U.P.
Surya Prakash Kesarwani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
