The High Court dismissed an unopposed writ petition on the date 29.5.2018, holding that the cause of action had either expired or the petitioner had lost interest in pursuing the matter. The stay order was vacated.
Writ petition dismissed; stay order vacated; liberty granted to move recall application within 30 days.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 7
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 34884 of 2001
Petitioner :- Ashok Kumar Yadav Respondent :- State Of U.P. & Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ajay Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Surya Prakash Kesarwani,J.
List revised. Case called out. No one appears on behalf of the petitioner to press this writ petition.
Learned standing counsel is present.
It appears that either cause of action does not survive or the petitioner has lost interest in pursuing the writ petition or there is no merit. Therefore, the writ petition is dismissed. Stay order, if any, is vacated.
Liberty is granted to the petitioner to move a recall application within 30 days, if he feels that the writ petition still survives.
With the aforesaid observations, the Writ Petition is dismissed .
Order Date :- 29.5.2018 vkg
Ashok Kumar Yadav
State Of U.P.
Surya Prakash Kesarwani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
