The Supreme Court dismissed a writ petition where the petitioner failed to appear to press the case, deeming the cause of action possibly dead or lacking merit, and vacated any stay order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 7
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 24133 of 2004
Petitioner :- Sri Narain Respondent :- State Of U.P. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ram Prakash Singh,P.P.Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Surya Prakash Kesarwani,J.
List revised. Case called out. No one appears on behalf of the petitioner to press this writ petition.
Learned standing counsel is present.
It appears that either cause of action does not survive or the petitioner has lost interest in pursuing the writ petition or there is no merit. Therefore, the writ petition is dismissed. Stay order, if any, is vacated.
Liberty is granted to the petitioner to move a recall application within 30 days, if he feels that the writ petition still survives.
With the aforesaid observations, the Writ Petition is dismissed .
Order Date :- 30.5.2018 NLY
Narain
State Of U.P.
Surya Prakash Kesarwani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
