In a writ petition calling in question an order, the court found the petitioner could not justify interference and was absent. The matter was deemed infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 12832 of 1995
Petitioner :- Murli Manohar Ojha Respondent :- State Of U.P. & Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Lalji Sahai Srivastava,S.Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,A. Kumar
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
"(i) to issue a writ in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned order with gradation list dated 28.2.1995 passed by opp. party no. 3 in respect of sl. nos. 26 to 40.
(ii) to issue a writ of mandamus directing the opp. parties concerned not to implement the gradation list dated 28.2.1995 in respect of sl. nos. 26 to 40."
Order Date :- 10.8.2018
AK
Murli Manohar Ojha
State Of U.P.
Sudhir Agarwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
