This order dismissed the second appeal on the ground that the appeal had abated because the sole respondent had died and no substitution was made in his place.
The second appeal was dismissed as it had abated due to the death of the sole respondent without substitution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34
Case :- SECOND APPEAL No. - 2833 of 1979
Appellant :- Pyarey & Others Respondent :- Raghunath
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
2. Dismissed accordingly.
Order Date :- 23.8.2018 Siddhant Sahu
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the second appeal has abated due to non-substitution of the sole deceased respondent.
Pyarey
Raghunath
Sudhir Agarwal
Siddhant Sahu
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
