This single-sentence order dismissed the writ petition seeking quashing of a cancellation appointment order because the petitioner failed to make out a case and the matter appeared either devoid of a surviving cause of action or abandoned, resulting in no appearance by the petitioner's counsel.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 16414 of 2003
Petitioner :- Raj Kumar Gupta
Respondent :- Pramukh Sachiv, Panchayati Raj, Anubhag-2, Govt. Of U.P.
Counsel for Petitioner :- H.P. Mishra,J.N.Tripathi Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Kamal Dev Rai,Ravi Prakash Srivastava,Satendra Sharma,Shailendra Sharma,V. Pandey
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
“ (a) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned order dated 22.3.2003, passed by respondent no. 1 (Annexure 1 to this writ petition) by which respondent no. 3 was directed to cancel the appointment of the petitioner immediately.
(b) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding to the respondents not to pass any order in compliance of the order dated 22.3.2003 passed by respondent no. 1.
(c) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding to the respondents not to give effect the petitioner in pursuant to order dated 22.3.2003 passed by respondent no.1.”
Order Date :- 16.8.2018 AK
Raj Kumar Gupta
Pramukh Sachiv, Panchayati Raj, Anubhag-2, Govt. Of U.P.
Sudhir Agarwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
