Nach Kau v. Harihar Prasad
Case brief
What is this about?
This second appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution as the appellant did not appear to press the matter. Any interim order stands vacated.
What did the court decide?
Appeal dismissed for want of prosecution; interim order, if any, vacated.
What the court decided
Court No. - 57
Case :- SECOND APPEAL No. - 1275 of 1989
Appellant :- Nach Kau Respondent :- Harihar Prasad Counsel for Appellant :- Rakesh Prasad,Arun Kumar Upadhyay,Jamwant Maurya Counsel for Respondent :- K.P. Shukla,Arun Kumar Upadhyay,Keshav Shukla
Hon'ble Shashi Kant,J.
Called in revise.
None appears to press the appeal.
Appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated. Order Date :- 12.1.2018 A. Verma
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Nach Kau
- respondent
Harihar Prasad
Coram
Shashi Kant
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · January
- Registered
- Case no.
- SAPL/1275/1989
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court