In Second Appeal No. 3204 of 1979, the appellant was absent to press their appeal, and the matter was dismissed in default for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 57
Case :- SECOND APPEAL No. - 3204 of 1979
Appellant :- Parmatma Prasad & Others Respondent :- Vishwanath Counsel for Appellant :- Y.Singh,B.B. Pandey,B.N.Pandey,Y.S. Saxena Counsel for Respondent :- S.D.Pathak,Arvind Kumar Tripathi,Dharm Raj Chaudhary,Dinesh Pathak,Rakesh Pathak,V.K. Saxena
Hon'ble Shashi Kant,J.
List revised. No one is present on behalf of the appellant to press this appeal.
The appeal is accordingly dismissed in default for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 11.1.2018 Monika
Parmatma Prasad & Others
Vishwanath
Shashi Kant
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
