The court dismissed Second Appeal No. 213 of 1991 for want of prosecution as no one appeared on behalf of the appellant to press the matter on the scheduled date. Any interim order stands vacated.
Appeal dismissed for want of prosecution; interim order vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 57
Case :- SECOND APPEAL No. - 213 of 1991
Appellant :- Bihari Lal Respondent :- Girish Chandra Counsel for Appellant :- Vipin Saxena Counsel for Respondent :- Rajeshji Verma
Hon'ble Shashi Kant,J.
List revised. No one is present on behalf of appellant to press this appeal.
The appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 11.1.2018 KA
Bihari Lal
Girish Chandra
Shashi Kant
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
