Premraj v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
This order notes the appellant's death and dismisses the criminal appeal as abated. The appeal, directed against a conviction under Section 307 IPC, could not be pursued due to the appellant's demise.
What did the court decide?
The appeal is dismissed as abated.
What the court decided
Court No. - 42
Case :- CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 178 of 1997
Appellant :- Premraj Respondent :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Appellant :- G.R.Singh,Apul Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Arvind Kumar Mishra-I,J.
Case called out in the revised list. None appears on behalf of the appellant to press this appeal. Learned A.G.As. for the State are present.
This appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 4.2.1997 passed by Sessions Judge, Budaun in Sessions Trial No.212 of 1991 whereby the appellant was convicted and sentenced to 7 years R.I. coupled with fine for Rs.1,000/-, in default of payment of fine, he shall undergo six month's R.I. under Section 307 I.P.C.
According to the report of the C.J.M. Budaun, sole appellant in this appeal- Premraj has died on 2.4.2012.
Since the sole appellant in this appeal- Premraj has died, this appeal is liable to be dismissed as abated.
The appeal is accordingly dismissed as abated .
Order Date :- 12.7.2018 Raj
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Premraj
- respondent
State Of U.P.
Coram
Arvind Kumar Mishra
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · July
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLA/178/1997
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court