Akeel Vs State of U.P.

Court No. - 45

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 29652 of 2018

Applicant :- Akeel Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Jitendra Prasad Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Siddharth,J.

¶5

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.

¶6

The allegation against the applicant is of providing space for keeping stolen motorcycles to the main accuseds, namely, Sri Kamaruddin and Sri Taufeeq. The applicant has no criminal history and is in jail since 18.06.2018.

¶7

Learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer for bail but could not dispute the aforesaid fact as argued by learned counsel for the applicant.

¶8

Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I am of the opinion that the applicant is entitled to be released on bail.

¶9

Let the applicant, Akeel , be released on bail in Case Crime No. 51 of 2018, under Sections 411, 413, 414, 420, 467, 468, 471 I.P.C, P.S. Chandpur, District- Fatehpur on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions which are being imposed in the interest of justice :-

¶10

The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence by intimidating/ pressurizing the witnesses, during the investigation or trial.

¶11

The applicant shall cooperate in the trial sincerely without seeking any adjournment.

¶12

The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail.

¶13

In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail. Identity, status and

¶14

residence proof of the applicant and sureties be verified by the court concerned before the bonds are accepted.

¶15

Order Date :- 7.8.2018 Rohit

Akeel v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Akeel v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mukhtar Ansari Vs State of U.P.

Ram Vs State of U.P.

Shrawan Kumar Vs State of U.P.

Kaluwa Vs State of U.P. and Others

Doctor Yadav @ Satendra Kumar Vs State of U.P.

Prem Kumar Yadav Vs State of U.P.