Ram v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court Court No. 45 released the bail applicant Ram in Criminal Misc. BA No. 13868 of 2017 filed under Sections 307 and 504 IPC. The court imposed conditions regarding witness tampering and surrenders.
What did the court decide?
Released on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties.
What the court decided
Court No. - 45
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 13868 of 2017
Applicant :- Ram Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Ashutosh Pandey,Sushil Kumar Dubey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Siddharth,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as the learned AGA for the State and perused the material placed on record.
This is the second bail application.
The instant bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant, Ram with a prayer to release him on bail in Case Crime No. 179 of 2016, under Sections 307, 504 IPC, Police Station Kharkhauda, District- Meerut, during pendency of trial.
It is argued by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is absolutely innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case with some ulterior motive.The argument is that P.W.1 and P.W.2 namely, Harishpal and Kamal Singh, who are sons of the injured have stated in their statements before the court below,that it was co-accused Tarun, who fired and caused injury to their father by country made pistol. No allegation has been made against the applicant for firing at the injured. The applicant is languishing in jail since 22.4.2016, who is not a previous convict. In case, the applicant is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the applicant is entitled to bail in a trial court for alleged offences under IPC Sections 307 and 504.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Ram
- respondent
State Of U.P.
Coram
Siddharth
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · August
- Registered
- Case no.
- BAIL/13868/2017
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court