Single judge of Court No. 14 dismissed an application under Section 482 CrPC as infructuous due to efflux of time, noting the applicant's lack of interest, while vacating any interim order and permitting a recall application.
Application dismissed as infructuous; interim order vacated; liberty to move recall application within six weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 14
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 8434 of 2006
Applicant :- Wakeel Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. & Another Counsel for Applicant :- Rajesh Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate,Jahangir Haider,S.K. Yadav
Hon'ble Abhai Kumar,J.
None present on behalf of the applicant even in revised list.
The matter might have become infructuous due to efflux of time that is why the applicant is not interested for pursuing the matter, it is dismissed as infructuous.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
In case, the applicant still interested in the matter, he will be at liberty to move a recall application within six weeks from today.
Order Date :- 18.4.2018 M/A.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the application under Section 482 CrPC should be dismissed as infructuous due to efflux of time.
Wakeel
State Of U.P.
Abhai Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
