An order in an application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. listed as infructuous due to the applicant's absence. The petition was dismissed as infructuous and for want of prosecution.
The application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. was dismissed as infructuous and for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 14
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 14151 of 2006
Applicant :- Yuvraj Singh Kapoor & Another Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. & Another Counsel for Applicant :- Chandan Sharma,Ravi Shankar Prasad,U.N. Sharma
Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate,Balwant Singh
Hon'ble Abhai Kumar,J.
The case is listed under the " Group of cases likely to be infructuous ".
The case is listed under the heading of "Group of Cases U/S 482 Cr.P.C. (likely to be infructuous)".
Case called out in revised list. None present on behalf of applicants to press this petition.
Accordingly, this petition is dismissed as infructuous as well as for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
In case the cause of action still survives and petition has not become infructuous, the applicants will be at liberty to move a recall application within six weeks from today.
Order Date :- 17.4.2018 Ajeet
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Yuvraj Singh Kapoor & Another
State Of U.P. & Another
Abhai Kumar
Ajeet
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
