Single judge dismissed Application u/s 482 No. 5940 of 2006 as infructuous due to efflux of time and lack of applicant presence, vacating interim order.
Application dismissed as infructuous; interim orders vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 14
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 5940 of 2006
Applicant :- Hari Chand And Others Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Rajeev Kumar Shrivatava Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Abhai Kumar,J.
None present on behalf of the applicants even in revised list. On 06.03.2018, none was present on behalf of applicants.
The matter might have become infructuous due to efflux of time that is why the applicants are not interested for perusing the matter, it is dismissed as infructuous.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
In case, the applicants still interested in the matter, they will be at liberty to move a recall application within six weeks from today.
Order Date :- 18.4.2018 M/A.
Hari Chand And Others
Abhai Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
