The applicant failed to appear at the call of the list, raising an application u/s 482 Cr.P.C., deemed infructuous, and was dismissed for want of prosecution with liberty to recall.
The petition is dismissed as infructuous and for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 14
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 10679 of 2006
Applicant :- Natthu Lal Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. & Another Counsel for Applicant :- G.B. Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Abhai Kumar,J.
The case is listed under the " Group of cases likely to be infructuous ".
The case is listed under the heading of "Group of Cases U/S 482 Cr.P.C. (likely to be infructuous)".
Case called out in revised list. None present on behalf of applicant to press this petition.
Accordingly, this petition is dismissed as infructuous as well as for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
In case the cause of action still survives and petition has not become infructuous, the applicant will be at liberty to move a recall application within six weeks from today.
Order Date :- 17.4.2018
Ajeet
Natthu Lal
Abhai Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
